David Saks: September 2011

David Saks - Real Estate Broker - The Real Estate Mart of Tennessee, Inc. - 4040 North Watkins-Suite #4 - Memphis, Tennessee 38127 - Phone (901) 357-4663

INVESTOR PLEADS GULITY TO BID RIGGING AT FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS

Investor Pleads Guilty to Bid Rigging at Foreclosure Auctions

Robert Rose, 47, Danville, California, a real estate investor pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Sacramento, California, to conspiring to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions held in San Joaquin County, Calif.

Rose pleaded guilty to conspiring with a group of real estate speculators who agreed not to bid against each other at certain public real estate foreclosure auctions in San Joaquin County. The primary purpose of the conspiracy was to suppress and restrain competition and to obtain selected real estate offered at San Joaquin County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices, the department said in court papers.

According to the court documents, after the conspirators' designated bidder bought a property at a public auction, they would hold a second, private auction, at which each participating conspirator would bid the amount above the public auction price he or she was willing to pay. The conspirator who bid the highest amount at the end of the private auction won the property. The difference between the price at the public auction and that at the second auction was the group's illicit profit, and it was divided among the conspirators in payoffs. According to his plea agreement, Rose participated in the scheme beginning in or about August 2009 until in or about October 2009.

To date, eight individuals, including Rose, have pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in connection with this investigation: Anthony B. Ghio, John R. Vanzetti, Theodore B. Hutz, Richard W. Northcutt, Yama Marifat, Gregory L. Jackson, and Walter Daniel Olmstead.

Rose pleaded guilty to bid rigging, a violation of the Sherman Act, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $1 million fine. The maximum fine may be increased to twice the gain derived from the crime or twice the loss suffered by the victims of the crime, if either of those amounts is greater than the statutory maximum fine. Rose also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

Christine Varney, Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, and Benjamin B. Wagner, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California, announced the charges.

"The Antitrust Division is committed to vigorously pursuing bid rigging conspiracies at real estate foreclosure auctions and prosecuting those who violate the antitrust laws to gain illegal profits and take advantage of adverse situations," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Pozen. "The division will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to investigate anticompetitive practices in real estate foreclosure auctions in the Sacramento area and into northern California."

"Perpetrators of schemes like the one charged here do not compete fairly," U.S. Attorney Wagner stated. "Instead, they muscle out honest bidders who don't play along. Such schemes not only drive down the price of the auctioned properties, they steal equity from those homeowners trying to weather the financial storm. Rose is the eighth defendant charged in this case. Prosecutions like this one send a clear message to those who may be tempted to cheat at auction: Don't."

These charges arose from an ongoing federal antitrust investigation of fraud and bidding irregularities in certain real estate auctions in San Joaquin County. The investigation is being conducted by the Antitrust Division's San Francisco Office, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California, the FBI's Sacramento Division and the San Joaquin County District Attorney's Office. Trial attorneys Anna Pletcher, Richard Cohen and Tai Milder from the Antitrust Division's San Francisco Office and Assistant U.S. Attorney Russell L. Carlberg are prosecuting the case.

The charges are part of efforts underway by President Barack Obama's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. One component of the task force is the national Mortgage Fraud Working Group, co-chaired by U.S. Attorney Wagner. For more information on the task force, visit www.StopFraud.gov.

                Anyone with information concerning bid rigging or fraud related to real estate foreclosure auctions should contact the Antitrust Division's San Francisco Office at 415-436-6660 or visit www.justice.gov/atr/contact/newcase.htm, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California at 916-554-2700 or the FBI's Sacramento Division at 916-481-9110.

Courtesy Mortgage fraud Blog




David Saks



Time&Temp Memphis

Legal Disclaimer
Please be advised that:

 The information and notices contained in this blog are intended to summarize recent developments and news. The posts are presented as general research and information. These posts are not intended, nor should be regarded, as legal advice. Some blog posts concern allegations made in civil lawsuits and in criminal indictments in United States Courts. All persons are presumed innocent until convicted of a crime and proven guilty. Readers who have particular questions or who believe that they need legal counsel should seek the advice of a qualified attorney. It is neither the editor's or author's intention to create a confidential relationship or any broker-client relationship via communication from this site at any time. Please consult with your state real estate board if questions & answers in the education section conflict with the laws of your region or if you need clarification regarding their applicability or how they may govern the services that you provide.

By entering this web site, you understand the following:
When you select a link to an outside Web site, you are subject to the privacy, copyright, security, and information quality policies of that Web site. David Saks:
1.DOES NOT control or guarantee the accuracy, legality, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of information contained on a linked Web site;
2.DOES NOT endorse linked Web sites, the views they express, or the products/services they offer unless linked web sites, the views they express, or the products/services they offer endorse or support David Saks in accordance with the standards of the Tennessee Real Estate Commission and the Federal Government's laws regarding commerce and the application, solicitation and transmission of internet-related concerns, commerce or social networking;
3.CANNOT authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites;
4.IS NOT responsible for transmissions users receive from linked Web sites;
5. That DavidSaks.Com is biographical & real estate related. Some links within will leave this site.
6. http://activerain.com/profile/davidsaks is internet-compliant & abides by the rules & regulations of the Tennessee Real Estate Commission, Eve Maxwell, Executive Director.
7. Unless indicated otherwise, ActiveRain does offer listings, or IDX and is provided for licensed salespersons, brokers, buyers & sellers of real property as a community & professional service.
8. David Saks is a retired / licensed real estate broker in the State of Tennessee, license #290452, and an independent contractor.
9. Information is believed to be accurate, but not guaranteed, at any realty link or document connected to the World Wide Web & viewable by anyone connected to the internet who has a web browser.
10. Brokers, buyers, sellers, agents & anyone should independently verify any information prior to submitting any offer to purchase goods & services from any link.
11. Please Visit The American Real Estate Alliance or Memphis.8k.Com for additional information regarding property issues for real estate professionals and consumers.

 

Photos © & Licensed by Nova Development

All Content Protected © 
Before you even think about
committing a real estate crime
click this red button.
Real Estate Crimes

© All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

"Information generated by the Department of Justice is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without the Department’s permission. Citation to the Department of Justice as the source of the information is appreciated, as appropriate."

Department of Justice Legal Policies


 

  Real Estate Crimes

 

Click "HERE" For Today's Question

 

 

TheListen Now!

David Saks Show

Saturday Nite

9pm-12am Central

University of Memphis

WUMR

 

Support
America's Hobby

Click Elvis

Mr.Saks' participation in ActiveRain ended April 13, 2015.

His blog archives will remain online.

May God bless you.

Comment balloon 0 commentsDavid Saks • September 28 2011 09:16AM
INVESTOR PLEADS GULITY TO BID RIGGING AT FORECLOSURE AUCTIONS
share
Investor Pleads Guilty to Bid Rigging at Foreclosure Auctions Robert Rose 47, Danville, California, a real estate investor pleaded guilty in U. S. District Court in Sacramento, California, to conspiring to rig bids and commit mail fraud at… more
FIVE SENTENCED FOR FLORIDA MORTGAGE FRAUD
share
5 Sentenced for Florida Mortgage Fraud Scam The following five defendants were sentenced to prison for their involvement in a Broward, Florida, mortgage fraud scheme: Matthew Gulla 35, Davie, Florida - 35 months, Rene Rodriguez, Jr. 37,… more
CLOSING ATTORNEY GETS FIVE YEARS IN PRISON FOR MORTGAGE FRAUD
share
Closing Attorney Sentenced for Mortgage Fraud Morris Olmer 83, New Haven, Connecticut, was sentenced by Chief United States District Judge Alvin W. Thompson to 60 months of imprisonment, followed by three years of supervised release, for his… more
TWO CHARGED WITH FORECLOSURE RESCUE SCAM
share
2 Charged with Foreclosure Rescue Scam Marshall E. Home and Margaret Elizabeth Broderick Tucson, Arizona, have been indicted and charged for bankruptcy fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud for their roles in an alleged foreclosure rescue scheme… more
GOLF COURSE & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PLEADS GUILTY TO BANKRUPTCY…
share
Local Golf Course Developer Pleads Guilty to Bankruptcy Fraud, Money Laundering U. S. Attorney’s Office September 27, 2011 Southern District of Ohio (937) 225-2910 .. more
LAS VEGAS WOMAN PLEADS GUILTY IN CONNECTION WITH SCHEME TO…
share
Fourth Las Vegas Resident Pleads Guilty in Connection with Scheme to Fraudulently Control Condominium Homeowners’ Associations U. S. Department of Justice September 23, 2011 Office of… more
ATTORNEY SENTENCED TO FIVE YEARS IN PRISON FOR MORTGAGE FRAUD
share
New Haven Man Sentenced to Five Years in Federal Prison for Role in Mortgage Fraud Scheme U. S. Attorney’s Office September 26, 2011 District of Connecticut (203) 821… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 1330
share
#1330 If you think the appraisal on the property is too low you should request a submit a reconsideration request only if it is requested by a loan officer. Is this fact true or… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 1329
share
#1329 A property lost some value because it was close to a county landfill site. Ths is know as functionl obsolescence Is this fact true or false Remember to… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 1328
share
#1328 Most all sales comparison methods of appraisal are based on the assessed values of property as used for the purposes of establishing revenue for property taxes. Is this… more