David Saks

David Saks - Real Estate Broker - The Real Estate Mart of Tennessee, Inc. - 4040 North Watkins-Suite #4 - Memphis, Tennessee 38127 - Phone (901) 357-4663

FEDERAL JURY ACQUITS TWO IN MORTGAGE FRAUD CASE

News Release -- March 28, 2015


                   FEDERAL JURY ACQUITS TWO IN MORTGAGE FRAUD CASE


An Eastern District of California federal jury in Sacramento, on Thursday, March 26, 2015, acquitted two defendants, Deborah Loudermilk and Buena Marshall, of mail fraud charges arising out of allegations of their having participated in a 2006 mortgage fraud scheme.


In the prosecution of the case, the government presented 26 witnesses and more than 300 exhibits. Unconvinced, the jury took slightly more than one day to acquit the defendants of all six of the charges against them.


Loudermilk was represented in the case by Summit Defense Senior Trial Counsel James Reilly, a former Orange County prosecutor who has been practicing criminal law for more than 39 years. Marshall was represented by Attorney Mark Reichel of the Sacramento law firm Reichel & Plesser. Reichel is a former federal public defender with more than 23 years experience in criminal defense.
It took more than 8 years to get the case to trial because the allegations were not even investigated until early 2010 and charges were not filed until October of 2011. During the more than three years that the case was pending, four of the original six defendants entered into "cooperative" plea agreements, by which they agreed to testify against the remaining defendants.


Among the prosecution witnesses were five convicted felons, including the four former co-defendants. In his closing argument, Loudermilk's attorney characterized the presentation of these witnesses as a "parade of the horribles". In a discussion with the
attorneys after the conclusion of the trial, a number of the jurors agreed, indicating that they had given little credence to the testimony of the convicted felons.


Reilly's closing argument also called the case the story of "Debbie and Goliath", noting that it was investigated by the FBI and the IRS, and that the government was represented in court by three Assistant US Attorneys, a US Attorney's paralegal and an IRS Special Agent. Despite the government resources invested in the case, he characterized the investigation against his client as inadequate and a rush to judgment. In particular, he noted that the investigators failed to record interviews with the suspects and ignored exculpatory evidence provided by Loudermilk.


Jurors found the failure to record the interviews significant because Loudermilk testified that she did not make incriminating admissions described in the summary report prepared by the investigators and testified to in court by the IRS investigator. As a result, jurors indicated that they gave equal weight to the testimony of the investigator and Loudermilk, and therefore disregarded the purported admissions.


The jury foreman also indicated that the government had done a good job of proving the case against those who had already pled guilty, but that the investigation had "cast too wide a net" in ensnaring Loudermilk and Marshall, who were real estate agents in the six purchases at issue.


The case was charged as "mail fraud" because interstate mail services were used to send documents involved in the scheme, which was conceived and executed primarily by two of the co-defendants, Kadesta Harris and Temika Reed. The two received the bulk of the approximately $200,000 in "cash-back-to-buyers" payments that resulted from the six purchases.


Loudermilk testified in her own defense, denying that she was aware that fraud was being committed or that she had any intent to defraud either the sellers or lenders involved in the two transactions in which she was served as an agent. Marshall did not testify, but Reichel in his argument contended that the evidence also failed to prove her participation in the scheme to defraud or that she had intended to defraud anyone.


In the end, the jurors agreed, concluding that the evidence did not show that either Loudermilk or Marshall had been knowing participants in the scheme to defraud, that either had committed any act material to the fraud, or that either had exhibited any intent to defraud the lenders in these transactions.


The defeat was a rarity for the US Attorney's Office, which routinely obtains convictions in nearly all of its cases. In 2014, the cases of 908 criminal defendants were concluded, with 902 of them being convicted, either through guilty pleas or jury verdicts. Only six were acquitted at trial. It was also the first time in his 23 years on the federal bench that Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., had presided over a trial in which the defendants were acquitted.

press release source:

Daniel Nguyen

 

Summit Defense

 

daniel@summitdefense.com

 

(510) 877-8357 (Phone)

 

(510) 439-2855 (Fax)




David Saks



Time&Temp Memphis

Legal Disclaimer
Please be advised that:

 The information and notices contained in this blog are intended to summarize recent developments and news. The posts are presented as general research and information. These posts are not intended, nor should be regarded, as legal advice. Some blog posts concern allegations made in civil lawsuits and in criminal indictments in United States Courts. All persons are presumed innocent until convicted of a crime and proven guilty. Readers who have particular questions or who believe that they need legal counsel should seek the advice of a qualified attorney. It is neither the editor's or author's intention to create a confidential relationship or any broker-client relationship via communication from this site at any time. Please consult with your state real estate board if questions & answers in the education section conflict with the laws of your region or if you need clarification regarding their applicability or how they may govern the services that you provide.

By entering this web site, you understand the following:
When you select a link to an outside Web site, you are subject to the privacy, copyright, security, and information quality policies of that Web site. David Saks:
1.DOES NOT control or guarantee the accuracy, legality, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of information contained on a linked Web site;
2.DOES NOT endorse linked Web sites, the views they express, or the products/services they offer unless linked web sites, the views they express, or the products/services they offer endorse or support David Saks in accordance with the standards of the Tennessee Real Estate Commission and the Federal Government's laws regarding commerce and the application, solicitation and transmission of internet-related concerns, commerce or social networking;
3.CANNOT authorize the use of copyrighted materials contained in linked Web sites;
4.IS NOT responsible for transmissions users receive from linked Web sites;
5. That DavidSaks.Com is biographical & real estate related. Some links within will leave this site.
6. http://activerain.com/profile/davidsaks is internet-compliant & abides by the rules & regulations of the Tennessee Real Estate Commission, Eve Maxwell, Executive Director.
7. Unless indicated otherwise, ActiveRain does offer listings, or IDX and is provided for licensed salespersons, brokers, buyers & sellers of real property as a community & professional service.
8. David Saks is a retired / licensed real estate broker in the State of Tennessee, license #290452, and an independent contractor.
9. Information is believed to be accurate, but not guaranteed, at any realty link or document connected to the World Wide Web & viewable by anyone connected to the internet who has a web browser.
10. Brokers, buyers, sellers, agents & anyone should independently verify any information prior to submitting any offer to purchase goods & services from any link.
11. Please Visit The American Real Estate Alliance or Memphis.8k.Com for additional information regarding property issues for real estate professionals and consumers.

 

Photos © & Licensed by Nova Development

All Content Protected © 
Before you even think about
committing a real estate crime
click this red button.
Real Estate Crimes

© All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

"Information generated by the Department of Justice is in the public domain and may be reproduced, published or otherwise used without the Department’s permission. Citation to the Department of Justice as the source of the information is appreciated, as appropriate."

Department of Justice Legal Policies


 

  Real Estate Crimes

 

Click "HERE" For Today's Question

 

 

TheListen Now!

David Saks Show

Saturday Nite

9pm-12am Central

University of Memphis

WUMR

 

Support
America's Hobby

Click Elvis

Mr.Saks' participation in ActiveRain ended April 13, 2015.

His blog archives will remain online.

May God bless you.

Comment balloon 2 commentsDavid Saks • April 03 2015 07:11PM
FEDERAL JURY ACQUITS TWO IN MORTGAGE FRAUD CASE
share
News Release -- March 28, 2015 FEDERAL JURY ACQUITS TWO IN MORTGAGE FRAUD CASE An Eastern District of California federal jury in Sacramento, on Thursday, March 26, 2015, acquitted two defendants, Deborah Loudermilk and… more
Settlement Agent Guilty of Mortgage Fraud - 45 Properties and $16 Mil
share
Settlement Agent Found Guilty of Federal Charges in Multi-Million-Dollar Mortgage Fraud Scheme Scam Involved 45 Properties and $16 Million in Mortgage Loans U. S. Attorney’s Office April 01, 2015 &… more
Inspector Admits Conspiring to Rig Contractor Selection Process
share
Union City, New Jersey Inspector Admits Conspiring to Rig Contractor Selection Process for Community Development Projects U. S. Attorney’s Office March 31, 2015 District of New Jersey (973) 645-2888.. more
Mortgage Fraud Blog April 1, 2015 - Ten New Articles
share
Mortgage Fraud Blog sends me an update email once per week. The Mortgage Fraud Blog website is updated every business day and you can always get the latest news by visiting www. mortgagefraudblog. com &… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 4010
share
The owner decides to abandon the property he has listed with a brokerage. This will terminate the relationship that the broker has with the owner. True or false Take your time. The solution is posted below the wildlife photo. &… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 4009
share
When a real estate broker acts as the agent for the seller the broker has an obligation to disclose confidential information about the seller to the buyer if it helps the chances of closing the deal. True or false Take your time. The… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 4008
share
In a real estate transactionn, when one speaks of a fiduciary relationship their typically referring to a relationship that will allow another person to act on behalf of another with the additional privilege and grant of legal power for the other… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 4007
share
A house was built on top a pile of manure. The ceilings of the home we're also poorly constructed and poorly attached to any supporting members or beams. This would be considerd an example of a stigmatized property True or false.. more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 4006
share
A buyer inquired as to whether or not a city landfill was going to be constructed on an adjacent lot in a new subdivision. The seller's agent replied that she didn't know even though the agent was fully aware of the fact and failed to disclose… more
Real Estate Practice : Lesson 4005
share
A buyer paid $460, 000 for the house. The lot was valued at $65, 000. The mortgage was for $200, 000. After all is said and done, how much equity does the homeowner have in the place A. $260, 000 F irst of all, the… more